Curricular Reform in Serious Illness Communication and Palliative Care: Using Medical Students’ Voices to Guide Change

Curricular Reform in Serious Illness Communication and Palliative Care: Using Medical Students’ Voices to Guide Change

Author: Reidy, Jennifer A. MD, MS; Brizzi, Kate MD; Chan, Stephanie H. MPH; et al.

Publication date: April 29, 2024

Purpose: To gather and leverage the voices of students to drive creation of required, integrated palliative care curricula within undergraduate medical education in Massachusetts, which is lacking in a majority of U.S medical schools.

Method: The study was conducted by the Massachusetts Medical Schools’ Collaborative, a working group committed to ensuring all medical students in Massachusetts receive foundational training in serious illness communication (SIC) and palliative care. Eight focus groups groups (2 per participating medical school) were conducted during January–May 2021 and included a total of 50 students from Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Tufts University School of Medicine, and the UMass Chan Medical School. Data collected from focus groups were discussed and coded. Themes were identified using the immersion/crystallization qualitative data analysis approach.

Results: Six key themes emerged. Students viewed SIC as essential to high-quality medical

practice regardless of specialty, and believed training in SIC skills and palliative care should be required in medical school curricula. Students preferred to learn and practice these skills using frameworks, particularly in real-world situations. Students recognized the expertise of palliative care specialists and described them as a scarce, often misunderstood resource in health care. Students reported iit was mostly “luck” if they were included in family meetings and observed good role models. Finally, students desired practice in debriefing after difficult and emotional situations.

Conclusions: This study confirms long-standing themes on students’ experiences with SIC and palliative care topics, including feeling inadequately prepared to care for seriously ill patients as future physicians. Our study collected students’ perspectives as actionable data to develop recommendations for curricular change. Collaborative faculty also created recommendations based on the focus group data for immediate and ongoing SIC and palliative care curricular change in Massachusetts, which can apply to medical schools nationwide.

Related Topics

2020-2021 Public Experience Research

November 23, 2021

This three-phased public experience research project leveraged participatory research methods to ensure that we’re asking about what really matters. Focused on the experiences of Black and Latinx people, low income people, and people with serious illness, disabilities and their caregivers, we sought to better understand their needs, their challenges in navigating the health care system, and their experiences engaging with clinicians in conversations about medical decisions and choices. Through varied language testing exercises (of clinician conversation statements, definitions of quality, care models and public-facing campaigns), the findings remind us of what everyone wants from their care and leverages that as a powerful lens for higher impact serious illness care quality improvement.

2017 Consumer Research: Deep Dive on Conversations

January 1, 2017

Following up with a cohort of respondents who participated in the Coalition’s 2016 baseline survey, this survey dove deep into the content of conversations between doctors and loved ones. It also included an expanded set of questions about the experiences of care for respondents who had a loved one die recently in Massachusetts.